First, I would like to thank Selma for sharing this story. I thought she was very brave to do so.

RHETORICAL RUBRIC

Do I want to read it again?

Yes,definitely

Do I understand it's purpose?

Yes. At first, it was unclear but she tied it in at the end.

Would a recognizable community of users understand the writer's purpose?

Yes, I believe people from all walks of like could draw inspiration from this.

Do I want to actualize any of the goals in the paper?

One of the main themes was not giving up even when life seems unbearable. I would like to actualize that goal.

Are these goals ascertainable, that is, can I find the document's "starting points" and assumptions (premises)?

The goal wasn't ascertainable until you got to the end.

Can I recognize and follow the lines of narrative, argument, and inquiry it promises and endeavors to develop?

Yes I can follow the narrative and see where she wanted to go with it.

Can I follow the directives it offers to users?

Yes, everybody can

Have I come away from the narrative with a fresh perspective on the topic?

Yes. That's the first first-hand account I heard about that war.

How well does the wiki space you are engaging and evaluating draw from and deploy relevant tools of narrative and argument (definition, analogy, cause, evaluation) for its case?

I thought it used it very well. It had an effective appeal to pathos which I feel is the best way to go for what she was trying to convey.

Can I find places where the narrative could have been strengthened?

Yes there were one or two grammatical errors.

Was the space composed in an accessible manner?

Yes

Was it designed for ease of use?

Yes

GRADING GRID

5/5 Interesting Narrative

4/5 Structure format Grammar

4/5 Clarity

5/5 Overall tone and Message

5/5 Completed overall assignments

23/25 Total