Get your own free workspace
View
 

Eric Evaluated

Page history last edited by PBworks 4 years, 7 months ago

I thought this narrative, was clear, concise, and professional.

 


RHETORICAL RUBRIC

 

Do I want to read it again?

Yes more for reference

 

Do I understand it's purpose?

Yes it was very clear

 

Would a recognizable community of users understand the writer's purpose?

Yes definitely. Mostly students

 

Do I want to actualize any of the goals in the paper?

Yes. I think living on a budget would help us all.

 

Are these goals ascertainable, that is, can I find the document's "starting points" and assumptions (premises)?

Yes, he stated clearly what he was going to help you do, and broke it down into what phases of your life can be helped how.

 

Can I recognize and follow the lines of narrative, argument, and inquiry it promises and endeavors to develop?

Yes, you can follow th narrative easily.

 

Can I follow the directives it offers to users?

Yes. Next time I need books or electronics I might check the websites he layed out.

 

Have I come away from the narrative with a fresh perspective on the topic?

Yes he offered new solutions to an old problem

 

How well does the wiki space you are engaging and evaluating draw from and deploy relevant tools of narrative and argument (definition, analogy, cause, evaluation) for its case?

I thought he appealled to logos mostly, which was most effective for this type of narrative.

 

Can I find places where the narrative could have been strengthened?

He could've expanded more, but I thought he did a good job of keeping it concise.

 

Was the space composed in an accessible manner?

Yes

 

Was it designed for ease of use?

Yes

 

 

 

 


GRADING GRID

 

4/5 Interesting Narrative

 

5/5 Structure format Grammar

 

5/5 Clarity

 

5/5 Overall tone and Message

 

5/5 Completed overall assignments

 

24/25 Total

Comments (0)

You don't have permission to comment on this page.